Posted by The Situationist Staff on August 25, 2011
Ryan Goodman, Derek Jinks, Andrew Woods, have recently posted their chapter, “Social Science and Human Rights” (forthcoming in their edited book, “Understanding Social Action, Promoting Human Rights,” Oxford University Press, 2012) on SSRN
* * *
Over the last twenty years, the social scientific understanding of human behavior has taken a significant leap forward. Important advances in several fields have increased the complexity and accuracy of prevailing models of individual actors, group dynamics, and communication. Unfortunately, too few of the key insights of that scholarship have been incorporated into the theory or practice of human rights promotion. In this project, we collect research from a broad set of disciplines and analyze its implications for human rights scholarship and practice. By focusing on non-legal scholarship that touches on norm creation, diffusion, and institutionalization, we present a broad range of interdisciplinary insights relevant to human rights scholars and practitioners.
* * *
Download the chapter for free here.
Related Situationist Posts:
- The Bush Frame: Us vs. Them; Good vs. Evil; Intentions vs. Consequences
- “Jeffrey Sachs on Our Situation – Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part V,”
- “Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Tenet: ‘Guilty’,”
- “The Law and Situation of Military Propaganda,”
- An Apathy Epidemic
- Too Many To Care
- “Some (Interior) Situational Sources War – Part VI,” and
- “With God on Our Side . . ..”
Posted in Abstracts | Tagged: Andrew Woods, Derek Jinks, human rights, Ryan Goodman | 1 Comment »
Posted by Adam Benforado on December 5, 2010
Qatar has been awarded the 2022 World Cup.
Given the mysteries of FIFA (soccer’s world governing body) decision making, I was less sure than most that the United States had this one “in the bag,” despite what the New York Times described as “an apparently superior technical bid.”
Still, I was surprised that the pea-sized (okay, Connecticut-sized) Middle Eastern nation got the nod . . . and more than a little disappointed given the human rights record of the country.
FIFA was apparently drawn to the idea of the transformative power of football and the notion that a World Cup in Qatar could alter opinions of the Arab world. According to the head of Qatar’s winning bid, Sheik Mohammed bin Hamad al-Thani, the 2022 World Cup will “present a new image of the Middle East — far away from clichés and closer to reality.”
But the present reality of Qatar is not so pretty.
As Amnesty International reported back in June of this year, Qatari laws “prescribe imprisonment for criticizing the Emir, for writing about the armed forces without permission and for offending divine religions, as well as . . . punish[ing] blasphemy and consensual ‘illicit sexual relations.'” In another report, it was noted that “discrimination against women [in the country] remains rife” and “[d]eprivation of nationality has been used by the government against a number of individuals and tribes to target political opponents.” According to the UN Refugee Agency, homosexual behavior is illegal in Qatar and, as recently as 1996, an American citizen was sentenced to six months imprisonment and 90 lashes for homosexual activity.
I am hopeful that winning the bid for the World Cup could prompt Qatar to think seriously about its commitment to human rights. There are twelve long years to improve the treatment of women, gays, dissidents, migrant workers, and others before the tournament begins. A lot of progress could be made.
But I remain skeptical. It appears that most of the Qatari 2022 proposal is focused on building glittering new soccer stadiums and ways to get to them (see the stunning video below). FIFA officials were clearly wowed by the $4 billion dollars allocated for soccer arenas and $50 billion allocated for transportation and other infrastructure improvements. What they should have been pushing for, however, was a commitment to fixing the abuses and injustice built into the Qatari legal and social systems.
* * *
For a sample of related Situationist posts, see “Can Sports Save the World? (& what must be done beforehand) – Part I & Part 2,” and “Manufactured Hype: Can ESPN’s Agenda-Setting Behaviour save Major League Soccer?.”
Posted in Politics, Public Relations, Situationist Sports, System Legitimacy | Tagged: FIFA, human rights, Quatar, World Cup | 2 Comments »
Posted by The Situationist Staff on June 12, 2009
Jonathan Todres has recently posted a fascinating article, titled “Law, Otherness, and Human Trafficking” (49 Santa Clara Law Review 605-672 (2009) on SSRN. Here’s the abstract.
* * *
Despite concerted efforts to combat human trafficking, the trade in persons persists and, in fact, continues to grow. This article suggests that a central reason for the limited success in preventing human trafficking is the dominant conception of the problem, which forms the basis for law developed to combat human trafficking. Specifically, the author argues that “otherness” is a root cause of both inaction and the selective nature of responses to the abusive practice of human trafficking. Othering operates across multiple dimensions, including race, gender, ethnicity, class, caste, culture, and geography, to reinforce a conception of a virtuous “Self” and a devalued “Other.” This article exposes how this Self/Other dichotomy shapes the phenomenon of human trafficking, driving demand for trafficked persons, influencing perceptions of the problem, and constraining legal initiatives to end the abuse. By examining human trafficking through an otherness-aware framework, this article aims to elucidate a deeper understanding of human trafficking and offer a prescription for reducing the adverse effects of otherness on both efforts to combat human trafficking and the individuals that now suffer such abuses.
* * *
You can download the article for free here. For a sample of related Situationist posts, see “The Situational Effect of Groups,” “The Situational Benefits of Outsiders,” “Racism Meets Groupism and Teamism,” “‘Us’ and ‘Them,’” “Team-Interested Decision Making,” “Some (Interior) Situational Sources War – Part I,” and “March Madness.”
Posted in Abstracts, Distribution, Ideology, Morality, Public Policy, System Legitimacy | Tagged: altruism, bias, children, culture, discrimination, gender, human rights, human trafficking, international law, othering, otherness, race, women | Leave a Comment »