Policy Implications of Implicit Social Cognition
Posted by The Situationist Staff on August 4, 2011
Situationist Contributor Brian Nosek and Rachel Riskind recently posted their paper, “Policy Implications of Implicit Social Cognition” on SSRN. Here is the abstract.
* * *
Basic research in implicit social cognition demonstrates that thoughts and feelings outside of conscious awareness or conscious control can influence perception, judgment and action. Implicit measures reveal that people possess implicit attitudes and stereotypes about social groups that are often distinct from their explicitly endorsed beliefs and values. The evidence that behavior can be influenced by implicit social cognition contrasts with social policies that implicitly or explicitly assume that people know and control the causes of their behavior. We consider the present state of evidence for implicit social cognition and its implications for social policy. We conclude that considering implicit social cognition can contribute usefully to policy, but that most uses of implicit measures themselves as selection or evaluation devices is not easily justified.
* * *
Download the paper for free here.
Related Situationist posts:
- The Situation of ‘Common Sense’
- “Measuring Implicit Attitudes,”
- “What Are the Legal Implications of Implicit Biases?,”
- “Confronting the Backlash against Implicit Bias,”
- “Legal Academic Backlash – Abstract,”
- “Naïve Cynicism in Election 2008: Dispositionism v. Situationism?,” and
- “Implicit Bias and Strawmen,”
For a list of Situationist posts discussing the research on implicit bias and the IAT, click here.
This entry was posted on August 4, 2011 at 12:01 am and is filed under Abstracts, Implicit Associations, Law, Legal Theory, Situationist Contributors. Tagged: Brian Nosek, discrimination, Implicit Association Test, implicit social cognition, Public Policy, stereotypes, validity. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.