The Situation of Litigators
Posted by The Situationist Staff on September 5, 2009
Situationist Contributor Jerry Kang, Nilanjana Dasgupta, Kumar Yogeeswaran, and Gary Blasi, recently posted their terrific new paper “Are Ideal Litigators White? Measuring the Myth of Colorblindness” on SSRN. Here’s the abstract.
* * *
This study examined whether explicit and implicit biases in favor of Whites and against Asian Americans would alter mock jurors’ evaluation of a litigator’s deposition. We found evidence of both explicit bias as measured by self-reports, and implicit bias as measured by two Implicit Association Tests. In particular, explicit stereotypes that the ideal litigator was White predicted worse evaluation of the Asian American litigator (outgroup derogation); by contrast, implicit stereotypes predicted preferential evaluation of the White litigator (ingroup favoritism). In sum, participants were not colorblind, at least implicitly, towards even a “model minority,” and these biases produced racial discrimination. This study provides further evidence of the predictive and ecological validity of the Implicit Association Test.
* * *
To download the paper for free, click here. To review all of the previous Situationist posts discussing implicit associations click on the “Implicit Associations” category in the right margin, or, for a list of such posts, click here.
This entry was posted on September 5, 2009 at 12:01 am and is filed under Abstracts, Implicit Associations, Law, Situationist Contributors, Social Psychology. Tagged: Asian Americans, colorblindness, discrimination, IAT, Implicit Association Test, implicit bias, jurors. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.