The Situationist

Archive for June 12th, 2008

Four Failures of Deliberating Groups – Abstract

Posted by The Situationist Staff on June 12, 2008

Image by jurvetson - FlickrCass Sunstein and Reid Hastie have posted their new paper, “Four Failures of Deliberating Groups” on SSRN. Here’s the abstract.

* * *

Many groups make their decisions through some process of deliberation, usually with the belief that deliberation will improve judgments and predictions. But deliberating groups often fail, in the sense that they make judgments that are false or that fail to take advantage of the information that their members have. There are four such failures. (1) Sometimes the predeliberation errors of group members are amplified, not merely propagated, as a result of deliberation. (2) Groups may fall victim to cascade effects, as the judgments of initial speakers or actors are followed by their successors, who do not disclose what they know. Nondisclosure, on the part of those successors, may be a product of either informational or reputational cascades. (3) As a result of group polarization, groups often end up in a more extreme position in line with their predeliberation tendencies. Sometimes group polarization leads in desirable directions, but there is no assurance to this effect. (4) In deliberating groups, shared information often dominates or crowds out unshared information, ensuring that groups do not learn what their members know. All four errors can be explained by reference to informational signals, reputational pressure, or both. A disturbing result is that many deliberating groups do not improve on, and sometimes do worse than, the predeliberation judgments of their average or median member.

Posted in Abstracts, Behavioral Economics, Choice Myth | Tagged: , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

%d bloggers like this: