<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Spoke.  We Ignored It.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2010/10/09/you-spoke-we-ignored-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2010/10/09/you-spoke-we-ignored-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:44:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Advertising By Pulling Advertising &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2010/10/09/you-spoke-we-ignored-it/#comment-22100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Advertising By Pulling Advertising &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 04:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/?p=11870#comment-22100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &#8220;You Spoke. We Ignored It,&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;You Spoke. We Ignored It,&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tamara Piety</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2010/10/09/you-spoke-we-ignored-it/#comment-20400</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tamara Piety]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/?p=11870#comment-20400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adam - They don&#039;t really care what customers want unless those wants can be reliably transmuted into profits. So as long as the &quot;you spoke we listened&quot; works to create positive consumer reactions you can expect it to continue to be ubiquitous. And I think you are right that it is a version of the &quot;control&quot; pitch. How many products are sold with the pitch - &quot;take back control!&quot; ?  Probably everything from laxatives, to hair color to ED drugs to antihistamines and headache remedies, prepared foods - you name it. It is clearly a popular message. The best part about this illusion of control is that consumers are similarly susceptible to suggestion that any failure of control is their own not a consequence of a relentless bombardment if sales pitches. If consumers are quick to assume full responsibility for &quot;falling for&quot; advertising puffing it becomes exhibit A for the advertiser to point to in saying it is not responsible, it is the consumer who shouldn&#039;t have believed its inflated claims! Neat trick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam &#8211; They don&#8217;t really care what customers want unless those wants can be reliably transmuted into profits. So as long as the &#8220;you spoke we listened&#8221; works to create positive consumer reactions you can expect it to continue to be ubiquitous. And I think you are right that it is a version of the &#8220;control&#8221; pitch. How many products are sold with the pitch &#8211; &#8220;take back control!&#8221; ?  Probably everything from laxatives, to hair color to ED drugs to antihistamines and headache remedies, prepared foods &#8211; you name it. It is clearly a popular message. The best part about this illusion of control is that consumers are similarly susceptible to suggestion that any failure of control is their own not a consequence of a relentless bombardment if sales pitches. If consumers are quick to assume full responsibility for &#8220;falling for&#8221; advertising puffing it becomes exhibit A for the advertiser to point to in saying it is not responsible, it is the consumer who shouldn&#8217;t have believed its inflated claims! Neat trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daphne Millar</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2010/10/09/you-spoke-we-ignored-it/#comment-20382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daphne Millar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 09:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/?p=11870#comment-20382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Customers say they want their views to be valued. Corporations therefore say that they value them. &quot; You spoke, we listened&quot; works on the meta-level.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Customers say they want their views to be valued. Corporations therefore say that they value them. &#8221; You spoke, we listened&#8221; works on the meta-level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
