The Racialized Situation of Vandalism and Crime
Posted by The Situationist Staff on May 6, 2010
Here is another segment from John Quinones excellent ABC 20/20 series titled “What Would You Do?” — a series that, in essence, conducts situationist experiments through hidden-camera scenarios (in consultation with renowned social psychologist John Dovidio).
* * *
* * *
* * *
To review a sample of related Situationist posts, see “Journalists as Social Psychologists & Social Psychologists as Entertainers,” “The Situation of Bystanders,” “The Situation of Racial Profiling,” “The Situation of Black and White,” “He’s a Banana-Eating Monkey, but I’m Not a Racist,” “The Legal Situation of the Underclass,” “Why Race May Influence Us Even When We “Know” It Doesn’t,” “Jennifer Eberhardt’s “Policing Racial Bias” - Video,” “A Situationist Considers the Implications of Simpson Sentencing,” and “The Situational Demographics of Deadly Force – Abstract.”
This entry was posted on May 6, 2010 at 12:14 am and is filed under Implicit Associations, Social Psychology. Tagged: crime, criminality, implicit racism, race, racism, vandalism. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


















Rita R. Handrich said
As trial consultants, we see racial bias up close and personal as we do pre-trial research. It’s tough to swallow when you have litigation parties who simply ‘happen’ to be African American or Muslim or some other minority toward whom mock jurors have antipathy.
More recently, we’re seeing an increase in bias toward those who are “not us” in one way or another. We write about this on our blog (The Jury Room) and in articles available for download on our website (http://www.keenetrial.com/). I think what the 20/20 series does is shows us how, when we are not aware we are being watched, we behave. And it often isn’t pretty.
What we see in our work is that the more NON-salient the ethnicity/race of the litigant is to case facts, the more bias we see. It’s counter-intuitive in some ways but not in others. NON-salient ethnicity/race does not alert us to be wary of our biases and so we act out of stereotypes and pre-existing beliefs/biases rather than carefully considering facts.
Stop that Thief! (or not) « The Situationist said
[...] The Racialized Situation of Vandalism and Crime [...]
Racial Prejudice in Real Estate Markets « The Situationist said
[...] Interactions,” “The Situation of Prejudice: Us vs. Them? or Them Is Us?” and “The Racialized Situation of Vandalism and Crime,” each of which contains a sizable list of other related Situationist posts. Possibly [...]
The Racialized Situation of Vandalism and Crime | Mug Shots USA said
[...] * * * To review a sample of related Situationist posts, see “Journalists as Social Psychologists & Social Psychologists as Entertainers,” “The Situation of Bystanders,” “The Situation of Racial Profiling,” “The Situation of Black and White,” “He’s a Banana-Eating Monkey, but I’m Not a Racist,” “The Legal Situation of the Underclass,” “Why Race May Influence Us Even When We “Know” It Doesn’t,” “Jennifer Eberhardt’s “Pol… Go to Source [...]
The Situation of Hate Crimes « The Situationist said
[...] To review a sample of related Situationist posts, see “Jena 6 – Part I,” “The Situation of Racism in LA Gangs,” “Racial bias clouds ability to feel others’ pain,” “An Apathy Epidemic,” “The Situation of Blaming Rihanna,” “Situationist Theories of Hate – Part III,” “Obesity and Bullying,” “Hoyas, Hos, & Gangstas,” “Unrecognized Injustice — The Situation of Rape,” “The Situation of Prejudice: Us vs. Them? or Them Is Us?” and “The Racialized Situation of Vandalism and Crime.” [...]