<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Situational Branding Effects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2009/07/14/situational-branding-effects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2009/07/14/situational-branding-effects/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:48:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey Lonchar</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2009/07/14/situational-branding-effects/#comment-15224</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mickey Lonchar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/?p=7409#comment-15224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his latest book &quot;Buy*ology,&quot; author Martin Lindstrom presents the results of a three-year neuromarketing study where consumers&#039; brains were analyzed during exposure to a variety of brand images. Among his conclusions: product placement does not work. 

In regard to your suggestions that &quot;perhaps marketers should look at product placement instead of television advertising,&quot; do you have any studies that show this may be effective or that contradict the findings of Lindstrom and his team?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his latest book &#8220;Buy*ology,&#8221; author Martin Lindstrom presents the results of a three-year neuromarketing study where consumers&#8217; brains were analyzed during exposure to a variety of brand images. Among his conclusions: product placement does not work. </p>
<p>In regard to your suggestions that &#8220;perhaps marketers should look at product placement instead of television advertising,&#8221; do you have any studies that show this may be effective or that contradict the findings of Lindstrom and his team?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subliminal messaging may not qualify as an Thaler-Sunstein approved nudge, but it can nudge you &#171; Nudge blog</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2009/07/14/situational-branding-effects/#comment-15171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Subliminal messaging may not qualify as an Thaler-Sunstein approved nudge, but it can nudge you &#171; Nudge blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 01:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/?p=7409#comment-15171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Situationist links to an interesting study by a pair of Duke researchers who placed hidden Apple and IBM logos [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Situationist links to an interesting study by a pair of Duke researchers who placed hidden Apple and IBM logos [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
