<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conference &#8211; The Free Market Mindset</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/conference-the-free-market-mindset/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/conference-the-free-market-mindset/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 19:48:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvard Law School conference on Free Market Ideology - Gorkemgozleme Sports &#124; World&#039;s Sport News</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/conference-the-free-market-mindset/#comment-24861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Harvard Law School conference on Free Market Ideology - Gorkemgozleme Sports &#124; World&#039;s Sport News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/?p=5642#comment-24861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Sciences of Harvard Law School will be hosting its third annual conference. The topic is &#8220;The Free Market Mindset: History, Psychology, and Consequences.&#8221; Given all that is going on in today&#8217;s economy and the government&#8217;s efforts to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sciences of Harvard Law School will be hosting its third annual conference. The topic is &#8220;The Free Market Mindset: History, Psychology, and Consequences.&#8221; Given all that is going on in today&#8217;s economy and the government&#8217;s efforts to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skeptikos</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2009/03/02/conference-the-free-market-mindset/#comment-14242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Skeptikos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 07:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/?p=5642#comment-14242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Monetary self-interest is a simplifying assumption economists make, not something they actually believe. I mean, not even economists are dumb enough to believe this is the case in real life.

So when I read descriptions of papers like Marglin&#039;s and Schwartz&#039;s above, I&#039;m kind of puzzled.

Why don&#039;t social scientists ever critique physicists for assuming that objects are volumeless masses in simple calculations? That kind of view could have disastrous effects, if it spread to intellectually vulnerable children.

And why aren&#039;t economists criticized for assuming perfect information? If they consistently use this assumption, won&#039;t they be risking delusions of omnipotence?


The only explanation I can think of is that these criticisms are the result of some kind of motivated reasoning. Perhaps we should be less worried about the free market mindset and more worried about the &lt;a href=&quot;http://wmthespiral.blogspot.com/2009/02/pinker-and-caplan-on-anti-market-bias.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;anti-market mindset&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monetary self-interest is a simplifying assumption economists make, not something they actually believe. I mean, not even economists are dumb enough to believe this is the case in real life.</p>
<p>So when I read descriptions of papers like Marglin&#8217;s and Schwartz&#8217;s above, I&#8217;m kind of puzzled.</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t social scientists ever critique physicists for assuming that objects are volumeless masses in simple calculations? That kind of view could have disastrous effects, if it spread to intellectually vulnerable children.</p>
<p>And why aren&#8217;t economists criticized for assuming perfect information? If they consistently use this assumption, won&#8217;t they be risking delusions of omnipotence?</p>
<p>The only explanation I can think of is that these criticisms are the result of some kind of motivated reasoning. Perhaps we should be less worried about the free market mindset and more worried about the <a href="http://wmthespiral.blogspot.com/2009/02/pinker-and-caplan-on-anti-market-bias.html" rel="nofollow">anti-market mindset</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
