Comments on: Disobedience at 150 volts http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/12/26/disobedience-at-150-volts/ Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:36:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: The Case for Obedience « The Situationist http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/12/26/disobedience-at-150-volts/#comment-14282 Mon, 09 Mar 2009 04:03:10 +0000 http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/?p=4481#comment-14282 [...] To read the entire article, click here.  To read some related Situationist posts, see “David Vitter, Eliot Spitzer, and Now John Edwards: The Disposition Is Weaker than the Situation,” “Solomon Asch’s Conformity Experiment . . . Today,” and “Solomon Asch’s Classic Group-Influence Experiment.”  For a list of previous Situationist posts discussing Milgram’s research click here. [...]

]]> By: New Milgram research « Whose Law Is it Anyway? http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/12/26/disobedience-at-150-volts/#comment-14050 Fri, 09 Jan 2009 06:00:04 +0000 http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/?p=4481#comment-14050 [...] Milgram research Jump to Comments The Situationist Blog recently posted about an interesting new study on the human ability to inflict pain on [...]

]]> By: Neuroskeptic http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/12/26/disobedience-at-150-volts/#comment-13999 Fri, 26 Dec 2008 11:24:56 +0000 http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/?p=4481#comment-13999 Excellent. Although it’s interesting that in Milgram’s Experiment 9, in which the “victim” specifically said before the experiment that he was only willing to take part if he could quit at any time, full obedience was still 40%…

I’ve got some thoughts on lesser-known aspects of the Milgram experiments here.

]]>