<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Law, Psychology &amp; Morality &#8211; Abstract</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/law-psychology-morality-abstract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/law-psychology-morality-abstract/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:36:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phylarchus</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/09/13/law-psychology-morality-abstract/#comment-13378</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phylarchus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 09:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/?p=3261#comment-13378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Law, Morality, Psychology, Philosophy, Religion, I say etc!... All have a common epicentre: MAN as an individuum oder as a part of synola, oder as mankind. 
Should our thinking be rearranged, should a new homocentral periphery with a longer diameter be drawn? Is for example not MAN but LIFE in all its forms (plant-, animal-, archaia-, microbial-) the important component? Is not the mankind-individuum but the cell, the gene, the environment necessary for its development to be served primarily? Does paradise really have to do, if anything, with egoistic fulfilment? 
Phylarchus
P. S.: I am a completely unknown Greek Cypriot, who does not wish to be exposed to publicity. Please respect this. If you do not accept that, please just disregard above writings, or else use them as you consider appropriate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Law, Morality, Psychology, Philosophy, Religion, I say etc!&#8230; All have a common epicentre: MAN as an individuum oder as a part of synola, oder as mankind.<br />
Should our thinking be rearranged, should a new homocentral periphery with a longer diameter be drawn? Is for example not MAN but LIFE in all its forms (plant-, animal-, archaia-, microbial-) the important component? Is not the mankind-individuum but the cell, the gene, the environment necessary for its development to be served primarily? Does paradise really have to do, if anything, with egoistic fulfilment?<br />
Phylarchus<br />
P. S.: I am a completely unknown Greek Cypriot, who does not wish to be exposed to publicity. Please respect this. If you do not accept that, please just disregard above writings, or else use them as you consider appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
