<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: David Vitter (Eliot Spitzer): The Disposition Is Weaker than the Situation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/03/13/david-vitter-eliot-spitzer-the-disposition-is-weaker-than-the-situation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/03/13/david-vitter-eliot-spitzer-the-disposition-is-weaker-than-the-situation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:35:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Vitter, Eliot Spitzer, John Edwards, Jon Ensign, and Now Mark Sanford: The Disposition Is Weaker than the Situation &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/03/13/david-vitter-eliot-spitzer-the-disposition-is-weaker-than-the-situation/#comment-15054</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Vitter, Eliot Spitzer, John Edwards, Jon Ensign, and Now Mark Sanford: The Disposition Is Weaker than the Situation &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/?p=1829#comment-15054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in response to the sex scandal du jour involving U.S. Senator David Vitter (R-LA). Last March we republished it in the wake of former New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer&#8217;s (D) remarkable [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in response to the sex scandal du jour involving U.S. Senator David Vitter (R-LA). Last March we republished it in the wake of former New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer&#8217;s (D) remarkable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Vitter, Eliot Spitzer, John Edwards, and Now Jon Ensign: The Disposition Is Weaker than the Situation &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/03/13/david-vitter-eliot-spitzer-the-disposition-is-weaker-than-the-situation/#comment-15006</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Vitter, Eliot Spitzer, John Edwards, and Now Jon Ensign: The Disposition Is Weaker than the Situation &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/?p=1829#comment-15006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] in response to the sex scandal du jour involving U.S. Senator David Vitter (R-LA). Last March we republished it in the wake of former New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer&#8217;s (D) remarkable [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in response to the sex scandal du jour involving U.S. Senator David Vitter (R-LA). Last March we republished it in the wake of former New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer&#8217;s (D) remarkable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grue</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/03/13/david-vitter-eliot-spitzer-the-disposition-is-weaker-than-the-situation/#comment-12439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 23:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/?p=1829#comment-12439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Spitzer&#039;s behavior is evidence of situationalism?  That seems to be a reach---presumably the situation of being a governor with everything to lose and without easy access to prostitutes would be conducive to marital fidelity.

Why, I manage not to sleep with prostitutes even though I probably wouldn&#039;t be caught, fired, and/or called a hypocrite for it.  Of course, I don&#039;t have $9000 to blow on a night, so I&#039;d have to settle for a medium-class call girl, so that might be it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Spitzer&#8217;s behavior is evidence of situationalism?  That seems to be a reach&#8212;presumably the situation of being a governor with everything to lose and without easy access to prostitutes would be conducive to marital fidelity.</p>
<p>Why, I manage not to sleep with prostitutes even though I probably wouldn&#8217;t be caught, fired, and/or called a hypocrite for it.  Of course, I don&#8217;t have $9000 to blow on a night, so I&#8217;d have to settle for a medium-class call girl, so that might be it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Clark</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/03/13/david-vitter-eliot-spitzer-the-disposition-is-weaker-than-the-situation/#comment-12290</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/?p=1829#comment-12290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It is the hard-core conservatives who too much of the time are attributing solely to people’s disposition what should be attributed significantly to the their situation.&quot;

This is an interesting point. What&#039;s the connection between being conservative and being dispositionist? Is it that conservatives tend to be more pessimistic about human nature, and so are more likely to chalk up faults to innate traits? Or is it because they are more punitive, and therefore would rather not admit evidence of external influences on behavior which might mitigate culpability? Or is it that in being more hierarchical, conservatives are happier to have clear winners and losers based on dispositional characteristics? Or is it because they&#039;re less open to new experience, and therefore less likely to accept recently developed situationist analyses that challenge the old dispositionist myths?  Just a few off the cuff and likely ill-formed hypotheses, so I&#039;d love to get or be pointed to some expert opinion on this. Thanks as always to the Situationist crew.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is the hard-core conservatives who too much of the time are attributing solely to people’s disposition what should be attributed significantly to the their situation.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is an interesting point. What&#8217;s the connection between being conservative and being dispositionist? Is it that conservatives tend to be more pessimistic about human nature, and so are more likely to chalk up faults to innate traits? Or is it because they are more punitive, and therefore would rather not admit evidence of external influences on behavior which might mitigate culpability? Or is it that in being more hierarchical, conservatives are happier to have clear winners and losers based on dispositional characteristics? Or is it because they&#8217;re less open to new experience, and therefore less likely to accept recently developed situationist analyses that challenge the old dispositionist myths?  Just a few off the cuff and likely ill-formed hypotheses, so I&#8217;d love to get or be pointed to some expert opinion on this. Thanks as always to the Situationist crew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
