<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pinker on the Situation of Morality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/pinker-on-the-situation-of-morality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/pinker-on-the-situation-of-morality/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:25:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neurolaw Sampler &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/pinker-on-the-situation-of-morality/#comment-12123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neurolaw Sampler &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/pinker-on-the-situation-of-morality/#comment-12123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a few related Situationist posts, see &#8220;Law &amp; the Brain,&#8221; &#8220;Pinker on the Situation of Morality,&#8221; &#8220;The Science of Morality,&#8221; and “Your Brain and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a few related Situationist posts, see &#8220;Law &amp; the Brain,&#8221; &#8220;Pinker on the Situation of Morality,&#8221; &#8220;The Science of Morality,&#8221; and “Your Brain and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Oasis &#187; Rationalizing Incest</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/pinker-on-the-situation-of-morality/#comment-11830</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Green Oasis &#187; Rationalizing Incest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 20:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/pinker-on-the-situation-of-morality/#comment-11830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] January 18, 2008 at 12:12 pm &#183; Filed under absolutism, morality, psychology   Julie is traveling in France on summer vacation from college with her brother Mark. One night they decide that it would be interesting and fun if they tried making love. Julie was already taking birth-control pills, but Mark uses a condom, too, just to be safe. They both enjoy the sex but decide not to do it again. They keep the night as a special secret, which makes them feel closer to each other. What do you think about that—was it O.K. for them to make love? (The Moral Instinct&#8212;via The Situationist) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] January 18, 2008 at 12:12 pm &#183; Filed under absolutism, morality, psychology   Julie is traveling in France on summer vacation from college with her brother Mark. One night they decide that it would be interesting and fun if they tried making love. Julie was already taking birth-control pills, but Mark uses a condom, too, just to be safe. They both enjoy the sex but decide not to do it again. They keep the night as a special secret, which makes them feel closer to each other. What do you think about that—was it O.K. for them to make love? (The Moral Instinct&mdash;via The Situationist) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilbert Wesley Purdy</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/pinker-on-the-situation-of-morality/#comment-11761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gilbert Wesley Purdy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/pinker-on-the-situation-of-morality/#comment-11761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While Steven Pinker has made a public career of debunking some of the received ideas of the discipline of psychology he shares more than a few himself.  A baseball analogy will make the point, I think.  All of the physiological mechanisms necessary in order to play baseball are encoded in our human genes.  The physiologist who wishes to bring the game under his purview, then, could argue that baseball is encoded in the human physiognomy in human beings at birth.  Viola! Now he is an authority regarding the game of baseball!

Yes, all of the building blocks of morality can be found in the components of the human genome, but those building blocks are no more &quot;morality&quot; than the firing of motor neurons are the game of baseball.  Until one learns, through extended social training -- for children we call this &quot;growing up&quot; and for societies &quot;culturally evolving&quot; -- neither baseball nor morals are possible.  Instead neurons exist (vice baseball) and a predisposition to rudimentary socialization (vice morality), and, as a result, Mr. Pinker&#039;s certainty that his discipline wields authority in the matter of morality is more than questionable.

The Times Magazine article does not seem to me to be one of Pinker&#039;s better. To use another analogy, he ingests a half-pound of sugar, a stick of margarine, two cups of flour, four raw eggs, etc., and tells us what a cake tastes like.  I like to think  that I might find the time to point out some the inconsistencies that result later in another comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Steven Pinker has made a public career of debunking some of the received ideas of the discipline of psychology he shares more than a few himself.  A baseball analogy will make the point, I think.  All of the physiological mechanisms necessary in order to play baseball are encoded in our human genes.  The physiologist who wishes to bring the game under his purview, then, could argue that baseball is encoded in the human physiognomy in human beings at birth.  Viola! Now he is an authority regarding the game of baseball!</p>
<p>Yes, all of the building blocks of morality can be found in the components of the human genome, but those building blocks are no more &#8220;morality&#8221; than the firing of motor neurons are the game of baseball.  Until one learns, through extended social training &#8212; for children we call this &#8220;growing up&#8221; and for societies &#8220;culturally evolving&#8221; &#8212; neither baseball nor morals are possible.  Instead neurons exist (vice baseball) and a predisposition to rudimentary socialization (vice morality), and, as a result, Mr. Pinker&#8217;s certainty that his discipline wields authority in the matter of morality is more than questionable.</p>
<p>The Times Magazine article does not seem to me to be one of Pinker&#8217;s better. To use another analogy, he ingests a half-pound of sugar, a stick of margarine, two cups of flour, four raw eggs, etc., and tells us what a cake tastes like.  I like to think  that I might find the time to point out some the inconsistencies that result later in another comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xoxoANP!</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/pinker-on-the-situation-of-morality/#comment-11675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xoxoANP!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/pinker-on-the-situation-of-morality/#comment-11675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Pinker on the Situation of Morality « The Situationist (tags: ReadMe) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pinker on the Situation of Morality « The Situationist (tags: ReadMe) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
