<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deep Capture &#8211; Part VII</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/deep-capture-part-vii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/deep-capture-part-vii/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 09:25:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biased? I know you are but what am I? &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/deep-capture-part-vii/#comment-15122</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Biased? I know you are but what am I? &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 05:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/deep-capture-part-vii/#comment-15122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] bias in conservatives, here.  For related Situationist The Maverickiness Paradox,&#8221; &#8220;Deep Capture – Part VII,&#8221; &#8220;The Situation of Biased Perceptions,&#8221; and posts, see &#8220;“I’m [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bias in conservatives, here.  For related Situationist The Maverickiness Paradox,&#8221; &#8220;Deep Capture – Part VII,&#8221; &#8220;The Situation of Biased Perceptions,&#8221; and posts, see &#8220;“I’m [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The company “had no control or influence over the research” . . . . &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/deep-capture-part-vii/#comment-13245</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The company “had no control or influence over the research” . . . . &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/deep-capture-part-vii/#comment-13245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] read the entire article, click here. For a sample of related Situationist posts, see &#8220;Deep Capture - Part VII,&#8221; &#8220;Promoting Smoking through Situation,&#8221; &#8220;Industry-Funded Research,&#8221; [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read the entire article, click here. For a sample of related Situationist posts, see &#8220;Deep Capture &#8211; Part VII,&#8221; &#8220;Promoting Smoking through Situation,&#8221; &#8220;Industry-Funded Research,&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Capture - Part VIII &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/deep-capture-part-vii/#comment-11984</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deep Capture - Part VIII &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/deep-capture-part-vii/#comment-11984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Deep Capture - Part&#160;VII [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Deep Capture &#8211; Part&nbsp;VII [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grue</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/deep-capture-part-vii/#comment-11891</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/deep-capture-part-vii/#comment-11891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, what&#039;s with the anti-business bias?  Just look at the picture you lead with.

Deep capture is an interesting idea, but one problem with the tone of these articles is that they treat governments and individuals as passive spectators in this fight.  For instance, tobacco companies and big pharma are now vilified in the popular press and widely perceived as being evil.  How did that happen?

In my job, a deep capture seems to have taken place, but it seems to have been perpetrated by politicians and special-interest groups.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, what&#8217;s with the anti-business bias?  Just look at the picture you lead with.</p>
<p>Deep capture is an interesting idea, but one problem with the tone of these articles is that they treat governments and individuals as passive spectators in this fight.  For instance, tobacco companies and big pharma are now vilified in the popular press and widely perceived as being evil.  How did that happen?</p>
<p>In my job, a deep capture seems to have taken place, but it seems to have been perpetrated by politicians and special-interest groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tracy</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/deep-capture-part-vii/#comment-11502</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2008/01/10/deep-capture-part-vii/#comment-11502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Center for Consumer Freedom sounds like it would have a consumer&#039;s best interests in mind, but it doesn&#039;t. All it cares about is getting money from the industries is tries to protect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Center for Consumer Freedom sounds like it would have a consumer&#8217;s best interests in mind, but it doesn&#8217;t. All it cares about is getting money from the industries is tries to protect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
