<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deep Capture &#8211; Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:35:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Capture - Part X &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/#comment-12689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deep Capture - Part X &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/#comment-12689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Part I of this series explained that our “deep capture” story is analogous to the (shallow) capture story told by economists (such as Nobel laureate George Stigler) and public choice theorists for decades regarding the competition over prototypical regulatory institutions. Part II looked to history (specifically, Galileo’s recantation) for another analogy to the process that we claim is widespread today — the deep capture of how we understand ourselves. Part III picked up on both of those themes and explains that Stigler’s “capture” story has implications far broader and deeper than he or others realized. Part IV examined the relative power (measured as the ability to influence situation) of large commercial interests today, much like the power of the Catholic Church in Galileo’s day. Part V described other parallels between the Catholic Church and geocentrism, on one hand, and modern corporate interests and dispositionism, on the other. Part VI laid out the “deep capture hypothesis” a bit more and  began loosely testing it by examining the role that it may have played in the “deregulatory” movement. Part VII provided some illustrative examples of how atypical “regulators,” from courts to hard-hitting news networks, reflect and contribute to deep capture. Part VIII contrasted different cultures for evidence of commercial interests in promoting dispositionism. Part IX described the strategy of employing third-party messengers.  Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Deep Capture - Part VI [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part I of this series explained that our “deep capture” story is analogous to the (shallow) capture story told by economists (such as Nobel laureate George Stigler) and public choice theorists for decades regarding the competition over prototypical regulatory institutions. Part II looked to history (specifically, Galileo’s recantation) for another analogy to the process that we claim is widespread today — the deep capture of how we understand ourselves. Part III picked up on both of those themes and explains that Stigler’s “capture” story has implications far broader and deeper than he or others realized. Part IV examined the relative power (measured as the ability to influence situation) of large commercial interests today, much like the power of the Catholic Church in Galileo’s day. Part V described other parallels between the Catholic Church and geocentrism, on one hand, and modern corporate interests and dispositionism, on the other. Part VI laid out the “deep capture hypothesis” a bit more and  began loosely testing it by examining the role that it may have played in the “deregulatory” movement. Part VII provided some illustrative examples of how atypical “regulators,” from courts to hard-hitting news networks, reflect and contribute to deep capture. Part VIII contrasted different cultures for evidence of commercial interests in promoting dispositionism. Part IX described the strategy of employing third-party messengers.  Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Deep Capture &#8211; Part VI [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Ross on Naive Realism and Conflict Resolution &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/#comment-12491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee Ross on Naive Realism and Conflict Resolution &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 04:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/#comment-12491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] To read the rest of the story, click here. For another Situationist post on naive realism, click here. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To read the rest of the story, click here. For another Situationist post on naive realism, click here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Capture - Part IX &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/#comment-12233</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deep Capture - Part IX &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 04:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/#comment-12233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Part I of this series explained that our “deep capture” story is analogous to the (shallow) capture story told by economists (such as Nobel laureate George Stigler) and public choice theorists for decades regarding the competition over prototypical regulatory institutions. Part II looked to history (specifically, Galileo’s recantation) for another analogy to the process that we claim is widespread today — the deep capture of how we understand ourselves. Part III picked up on both of those themes and explains that Stigler’s “capture” story has implications far broader and deeper than he or others realized. Part IV examined the relative power (measured as the ability to influence situation) of large commercial interests today, much like the power of the Catholic Church in Galileo’s day. Part V described other parallels between the Catholic Church and geocentrism, on one hand, and modern corporate interests and dispositionism, on the other. Part VI laid out the “deep capture hypothesis” a bit more and  began loosely testing it by examining the role that it may have played in the “deregulatory” movement. Part VII provided some illustrative examples of how atypical “regulators,” from courts to hard-hitting news networks, reflect and contribute to deep capture. Part VIII contrasted different cultures for evidence of commercial interests in promoting dispositionism. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part I of this series explained that our “deep capture” story is analogous to the (shallow) capture story told by economists (such as Nobel laureate George Stigler) and public choice theorists for decades regarding the competition over prototypical regulatory institutions. Part II looked to history (specifically, Galileo’s recantation) for another analogy to the process that we claim is widespread today — the deep capture of how we understand ourselves. Part III picked up on both of those themes and explains that Stigler’s “capture” story has implications far broader and deeper than he or others realized. Part IV examined the relative power (measured as the ability to influence situation) of large commercial interests today, much like the power of the Catholic Church in Galileo’s day. Part V described other parallels between the Catholic Church and geocentrism, on one hand, and modern corporate interests and dispositionism, on the other. Part VI laid out the “deep capture hypothesis” a bit more and  began loosely testing it by examining the role that it may have played in the “deregulatory” movement. Part VII provided some illustrative examples of how atypical “regulators,” from courts to hard-hitting news networks, reflect and contribute to deep capture. Part VIII contrasted different cultures for evidence of commercial interests in promoting dispositionism. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Capture - Part VIII &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/#comment-11978</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deep Capture - Part VIII &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/#comment-11978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Part I of this series explained that our “deep capture” story is analogous to the (shallow) capture story told by economists (such as Nobel laureate George Stigler) and public choice theorists for decades regarding the competition over prototypical regulatory institutions. Part II looked to history (specifically, Galileo’s recantation) for another analogy to the process that we claim is widespread today — the deep capture of how we understand ourselves. Part III picked up on both of those themes and explains that Stigler’s “capture” story has implications far broader and deeper than he or others realized. Part IV examined the relative power (measured as the ability to influence situation) of large commercial interests today, much like the power of the Catholic Church in Galileo’s day. Part V described other parallels between the Catholic Church and geocentrism, on one hand, and modern corporate interests and dispositionism, on the other. Part VI laid out the &#8220;deep capture hypothesis&#8221; a bit more and  began loosely testing it by examining the role that it may have played in the &#8220;deregulatory&#8221; movement. Part VII provided some illustrative examples of how atypical &#8220;regulators,&#8221; from courts to hard-hitting news networks, reflect and contribute to deep capture. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part I of this series explained that our “deep capture” story is analogous to the (shallow) capture story told by economists (such as Nobel laureate George Stigler) and public choice theorists for decades regarding the competition over prototypical regulatory institutions. Part II looked to history (specifically, Galileo’s recantation) for another analogy to the process that we claim is widespread today — the deep capture of how we understand ourselves. Part III picked up on both of those themes and explains that Stigler’s “capture” story has implications far broader and deeper than he or others realized. Part IV examined the relative power (measured as the ability to influence situation) of large commercial interests today, much like the power of the Catholic Church in Galileo’s day. Part V described other parallels between the Catholic Church and geocentrism, on one hand, and modern corporate interests and dispositionism, on the other. Part VI laid out the &#8220;deep capture hypothesis&#8221; a bit more and  began loosely testing it by examining the role that it may have played in the &#8220;deregulatory&#8221; movement. Part VII provided some illustrative examples of how atypical &#8220;regulators,&#8221; from courts to hard-hitting news networks, reflect and contribute to deep capture. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Capture - Part VII &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/#comment-11455</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deep Capture - Part VII &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 04:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/#comment-11455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Part I of this series explained that our “deep capture” story is analogous to the (shallow) capture story told by economists (such as Nobel laureate George Stigler) and public choice theorists for decades regarding the competition over prototypical regulatory institutions. Part II looked to history (specifically, Galileo’s recantation) for another analogy to the process that we claim is widespread today — the deep capture of how we understand ourselves. Part III picked up on both of those themes and explains that Stigler’s “capture” story has implications far broader and deeper than he or others realized. Part IV examined the relative power (measured as the ability to influence situation) of large commercial interests today, much like the power of the Catholic Church in Galileo’s day. Part V described other parallels between the Catholic Church and geocentrism, on one hand, and modern corporate interests and dispositionism, on the other. Part VI laid out the &#8220;deep capture hypothesis&#8221; a bit more and  began loosely testing it by examining the role that it may have played in the &#8220;deregulatory&#8221; movement. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part I of this series explained that our “deep capture” story is analogous to the (shallow) capture story told by economists (such as Nobel laureate George Stigler) and public choice theorists for decades regarding the competition over prototypical regulatory institutions. Part II looked to history (specifically, Galileo’s recantation) for another analogy to the process that we claim is widespread today — the deep capture of how we understand ourselves. Part III picked up on both of those themes and explains that Stigler’s “capture” story has implications far broader and deeper than he or others realized. Part IV examined the relative power (measured as the ability to influence situation) of large commercial interests today, much like the power of the Catholic Church in Galileo’s day. Part V described other parallels between the Catholic Church and geocentrism, on one hand, and modern corporate interests and dispositionism, on the other. Part VI laid out the &#8220;deep capture hypothesis&#8221; a bit more and  began loosely testing it by examining the role that it may have played in the &#8220;deregulatory&#8221; movement. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Capture - Part V &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/#comment-10539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deep Capture - Part V &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 04:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/#comment-10539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Part I of this series explained that our “deep capture” story is analogous to the (shallow) capture story told by economists (such as Nobel laureate George Stigler) and public choice theorists for decades regarding the competition over prototypical regulatory institutions. Part II looked to history (specifically, Galileo’s recantation) for another analogy to the process that we claim is widespread today — the deep capture of how we understand ourselves. Part III picked up on both of those themes and explains that Stigler’s “capture” story has implications far broader and deeper than he or others realized. Part IV examined the relative power (measured as the ability to influence situation) of large commercial interests today, much like the power of the Catholic Church in Galileo’s day. This part describes other parallels between the Catholic Church and geocentrism, on one hand, and modern corporate interests and dispositionism, on the other. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Part I of this series explained that our “deep capture” story is analogous to the (shallow) capture story told by economists (such as Nobel laureate George Stigler) and public choice theorists for decades regarding the competition over prototypical regulatory institutions. Part II looked to history (specifically, Galileo’s recantation) for another analogy to the process that we claim is widespread today — the deep capture of how we understand ourselves. Part III picked up on both of those themes and explains that Stigler’s “capture” story has implications far broader and deeper than he or others realized. Part IV examined the relative power (measured as the ability to influence situation) of large commercial interests today, much like the power of the Catholic Church in Galileo’s day. This part describes other parallels between the Catholic Church and geocentrism, on one hand, and modern corporate interests and dispositionism, on the other. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Capture - Part IV &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/#comment-10324</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deep Capture - Part IV &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 04:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/#comment-10324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] what Situationist Contributor David Yosifon and I call &#8220;deep capture.&#8221; This post, like Part I, Part II, and Part III, is drawn from our 2003 article, &#8220;The Situation&#8221; (downloadable [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what Situationist Contributor David Yosifon and I call &#8220;deep capture.&#8221; This post, like Part I, Part II, and Part III, is drawn from our 2003 article, &#8220;The Situation&#8221; (downloadable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Capture - Part III &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/#comment-9592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deep Capture - Part III &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/#comment-9592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Deep Capture - Part&#160;I [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Deep Capture &#8211; Part&nbsp;I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deep Capture - Part II &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/#comment-8975</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Deep Capture - Part II &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 04:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/10/31/deep-capture-part-i/#comment-8975</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Deep Capture - Part&#160;I [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Deep Capture &#8211; Part&nbsp;I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
