<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheating Doesn&#8217;t Pay . . . So Why So Much of it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/09/13/cheating-doesnt-pay-so-why-so-much-of-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/09/13/cheating-doesnt-pay-so-why-so-much-of-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:16:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Situationist Account of the NFL, Bill Belichick, and Videotapes - Gorkemgozleme Sports &#124; World&#039;s Sport News</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/09/13/cheating-doesnt-pay-so-why-so-much-of-it/#comment-24821</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Situationist Account of the NFL, Bill Belichick, and Videotapes - Gorkemgozleme Sports &#124; World&#039;s Sport News]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 01:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/09/13/cheating-doesnt-pay-so-why-so-much-of-it/#comment-24821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] on The Situationist, Goutam Jois takes a different approach and examines the role played by the NFL in creating a situation in which wrongdoing could occur. Here is an excerpt from his piece: Perhaps part of the explanation [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on The Situationist, Goutam Jois takes a different approach and examines the role played by the NFL in creating a situation in which wrongdoing could occur. Here is an excerpt from his piece: Perhaps part of the explanation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug S.</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/09/13/cheating-doesnt-pay-so-why-so-much-of-it/#comment-6907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/09/13/cheating-doesnt-pay-so-why-so-much-of-it/#comment-6907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How much you stand to lose if you get caught doesn&#039;t matter as long as you believe you&#039;re not going to get caught.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much you stand to lose if you get caught doesn&#8217;t matter as long as you believe you&#8217;re not going to get caught.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goutam Jois</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/09/13/cheating-doesnt-pay-so-why-so-much-of-it/#comment-6873</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Goutam Jois]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 02:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/09/13/cheating-doesnt-pay-so-why-so-much-of-it/#comment-6873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ari,

Thanks for the comment.  First, &quot;[P]olaroids and binoculars&quot; do not constitute video taping.  Second, video taping by the teams, in the manner that the Patriots did, is not permitted.  On September 6, 2006, Ray Anderson, a vice president for the NFL, sent all teams a memorandum that specified:

&quot;Video taping of any type, including but not limited to taping of an opponent&#039;s offensive or defensive signals, is prohibited on the sidelines, in the coaches&#039; booth, in the locker room, or at any other locations accessible to club staff members during the game&quot;

The NFL&#039;s Game Operations Manual similarly provides that &quot;no video recording devices of any kind are permitted to be in use in the coaches&#039; booth, on the field, or in the locker room during the game.&quot;

Of course teams are allowed to record games, but the manual also states that &quot;all video shooting locations must be enclosed on all sides with a roof overhead.&quot;  The &quot;employee&#039;s location,&quot; as you put it, is relevant precisely to forestall cheating: if, from his location, the employee could videotape hand signals, those signals could be matched against the overhead recording of the game to determine which signals correspond to which plays. 

A more elaborate version of my abbreviated response is available from the &lt;a href=&quot;Boston Globe&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/articles/2007/09/13/a_sorry_state/ &lt;/a&gt;.

In any event, the point of the post was not to engage in a technical dispute about the interpretation of the rules (although this was Coach Belichick&#039;s initial response).  Instead, it is to pose the more fundamental question of how and why highly-competitive environments lead to behavior that most, if not all, agree is undesirable.  After all, even if the issue were just &quot;an employee&#039;s location&quot; (which I don&#039;t believe it is), the fact remains that the team circumvented the rules for competitive advantage.  Why would one with so much to lose do that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ari,</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.  First, &#8220;[P]olaroids and binoculars&#8221; do not constitute video taping.  Second, video taping by the teams, in the manner that the Patriots did, is not permitted.  On September 6, 2006, Ray Anderson, a vice president for the NFL, sent all teams a memorandum that specified:</p>
<p>&#8220;Video taping of any type, including but not limited to taping of an opponent&#8217;s offensive or defensive signals, is prohibited on the sidelines, in the coaches&#8217; booth, in the locker room, or at any other locations accessible to club staff members during the game&#8221;</p>
<p>The NFL&#8217;s Game Operations Manual similarly provides that &#8220;no video recording devices of any kind are permitted to be in use in the coaches&#8217; booth, on the field, or in the locker room during the game.&#8221;</p>
<p>Of course teams are allowed to record games, but the manual also states that &#8220;all video shooting locations must be enclosed on all sides with a roof overhead.&#8221;  The &#8220;employee&#8217;s location,&#8221; as you put it, is relevant precisely to forestall cheating: if, from his location, the employee could videotape hand signals, those signals could be matched against the overhead recording of the game to determine which signals correspond to which plays. </p>
<p>A more elaborate version of my abbreviated response is available from the <a href="Boston Globe" rel="nofollow"> </a><a href="http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/articles/2007/09/13/a_sorry_state/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boston.com/sports/football/patriots/articles/2007/09/13/a_sorry_state/</a> .</p>
<p>In any event, the point of the post was not to engage in a technical dispute about the interpretation of the rules (although this was Coach Belichick&#8217;s initial response).  Instead, it is to pose the more fundamental question of how and why highly-competitive environments lead to behavior that most, if not all, agree is undesirable.  After all, even if the issue were just &#8220;an employee&#8217;s location&#8221; (which I don&#8217;t believe it is), the fact remains that the team circumvented the rules for competitive advantage.  Why would one with so much to lose do that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qwerty</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/09/13/cheating-doesnt-pay-so-why-so-much-of-it/#comment-6864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[qwerty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 20:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/09/13/cheating-doesnt-pay-so-why-so-much-of-it/#comment-6864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cheating does pay or people would not do it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheating does pay or people would not do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ari</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/09/13/cheating-doesnt-pay-so-why-so-much-of-it/#comment-6861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/09/13/cheating-doesnt-pay-so-why-so-much-of-it/#comment-6861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Location, Location, Location

It is amazing how poor readers still like to write.  If you were to educate yourself, you&#039;d know that the NFL permits video taping (filming, polaroids, use of binoculars) by the teams to glean information about each other.  Read all about it, it&#039;s in the rule book.  There are restrictions as to where you can be when you do the recording, and a Patriots employee was in a non-authorized location on Sunday.  That&#039;s the entire issue here: an employee&#039;s location.  Every team studies every other team every week.  Did you really not know this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Location, Location, Location</p>
<p>It is amazing how poor readers still like to write.  If you were to educate yourself, you&#8217;d know that the NFL permits video taping (filming, polaroids, use of binoculars) by the teams to glean information about each other.  Read all about it, it&#8217;s in the rule book.  There are restrictions as to where you can be when you do the recording, and a Patriots employee was in a non-authorized location on Sunday.  That&#8217;s the entire issue here: an employee&#8217;s location.  Every team studies every other team every week.  Did you really not know this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
