<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Situation of Happiness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/the-situation-of-happiness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/the-situation-of-happiness/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 14:35:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winston</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/the-situation-of-happiness/#comment-12880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Winston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 18:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/the-situation-of-happiness/#comment-12880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently spotted a young chemistry professor (I know this isn&#039;t the humanities department, but stay with me) walking down the corridor carrying an infant. His life doesn&#039;t appear to be on hold. Or he could not have kids and his life would still have its share of headaches. Parents may not be &quot;unhappy&quot; so much as they are not engaged, since, after all, starting at 5, or too often at 4, the state begins to act in loco parentis. You don&#039;t raise your kids, a certified stranger does. You don&#039;t raise your kids, mass schooling does. The first thing kids learn in school is to seek out and have contempt for weakness in others. Their growth is headed off at the pass by busy work. By the time they&#039;re teens they&#039;re childish adults, trained in cruelty and rudeness and boredom, and after spending their natural childhoods inside a building somewhere, their parents ask, &quot;why are my teens like strangers!?&quot; What are parents? People who keep kids in their house in the evening and over night, who must work to feed them and must sign report cards. The state is to take care of the rest. It&#039;s not really your job to think about what it means to be a parent, to be competent, responsible... just park them in front of the tv - it&#039;s not your job to know what&#039;s good for them (beyond getting them xmas presents), that&#039;s the job of a certified school person. Just saying - the situation is more complicated than what is presented in this article...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently spotted a young chemistry professor (I know this isn&#8217;t the humanities department, but stay with me) walking down the corridor carrying an infant. His life doesn&#8217;t appear to be on hold. Or he could not have kids and his life would still have its share of headaches. Parents may not be &#8220;unhappy&#8221; so much as they are not engaged, since, after all, starting at 5, or too often at 4, the state begins to act in loco parentis. You don&#8217;t raise your kids, a certified stranger does. You don&#8217;t raise your kids, mass schooling does. The first thing kids learn in school is to seek out and have contempt for weakness in others. Their growth is headed off at the pass by busy work. By the time they&#8217;re teens they&#8217;re childish adults, trained in cruelty and rudeness and boredom, and after spending their natural childhoods inside a building somewhere, their parents ask, &#8220;why are my teens like strangers!?&#8221; What are parents? People who keep kids in their house in the evening and over night, who must work to feed them and must sign report cards. The state is to take care of the rest. It&#8217;s not really your job to think about what it means to be a parent, to be competent, responsible&#8230; just park them in front of the tv &#8211; it&#8217;s not your job to know what&#8217;s good for them (beyond getting them xmas presents), that&#8217;s the job of a certified school person. Just saying &#8211; the situation is more complicated than what is presented in this article&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t Worry, But Don&#8217;t Be Happy, Either? &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/the-situation-of-happiness/#comment-8149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don&#8217;t Worry, But Don&#8217;t Be Happy, Either? &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 04:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/the-situation-of-happiness/#comment-8149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 20th, 2007  We have examined the topic of happiness on multiple occasions, including in &#8220;The Situation of Happiness&#8221; and most recently in &#8220;Situating Emotions.&#8221; In addition, Situationist friend Dan [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 20th, 2007  We have examined the topic of happiness on multiple occasions, including in &#8220;The Situation of Happiness&#8221; and most recently in &#8220;Situating Emotions.&#8221; In addition, Situationist friend Dan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can Emotional Intelligence be Taught? &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/the-situation-of-happiness/#comment-6689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Can Emotional Intelligence be Taught? &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 04:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/the-situation-of-happiness/#comment-6689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The Situation of&#160;Happiness [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Situation of&nbsp;Happiness [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug S.</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/the-situation-of-happiness/#comment-6315</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 16:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/the-situation-of-happiness/#comment-6315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;For most of human history, Gilbert said, happiness wasn’t much of a secret — everybody knew that happiness is just “what happens when you get what you want.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Buddhists would disagree, and Buddhism is a very old philosophy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>For most of human history, Gilbert said, happiness wasn’t much of a secret — everybody knew that happiness is just “what happens when you get what you want.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Buddhists would disagree, and Buddhism is a very old philosophy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Small 'Stute Fish</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/the-situation-of-happiness/#comment-6176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Small 'Stute Fish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/the-situation-of-happiness/#comment-6176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course, I&#039;d have to see Gilbert&#039;s methodology on this one, but I read about this on his blog a while back, and I really have to wonder at the assertions he&#039;s making about children and happiness. I think his measure of happiness is off; he&#039;s measuring in-the-moment satisfaction rather than overall reported life satisfaction, and something that does not provide one can provide the other. For example, the minutiae of my job do not make me happy, most of the time, but the overall result of a job well done and the structure it lends to my life do. 

It also seems from this article that he&#039;s measuring WOMEN&#039;S happiness in relation to children, not men&#039;s. There&#039;s a simpler explanation for that - what if sexism and its effects on parenting roles is what makes women unhappy? I think my partner enjoys his time with our son in part because I buy our son&#039;s clothes, wash his clothes, make his lunch, make his dinner, take care of all the doctor&#039;s appointments, do most of the daycare pick up and dropoff, do most of the diapering, stock the diaper basket/bag, dress him, grocery shop to make sure we have food for him, do most of the childcare, research preschools, stay home with him when he&#039;s sick, make sure his shoes fit, take him on trips, pick up his play area, wash his dishes, etc. etc. etc., in addition to working full-time myself. A lot of my time spent with my son ends up being multitasking, transportation, or mealtime/diapers, and I&#039;m not at all unusual in this. It&#039;s not my son making me unhappy, it&#039;s everything else I have to do and how tired I get and how little time I have to myself! Most women I know end up doing even more of the &quot;work&quot; part of childcare than I do, and mothers who stay home do almost all of it, without the variety, stimulation, and adult interaction that a job outside the home provides. 

I hate to say this, but my immediate reaction was, &quot;Only a man would decide it was the kid&#039;s fault without thinking about ingrained power imbalances!&quot; You want a situation? Let&#039;s talk about the situation of ingrained gender roles and systemic power imbalances.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, I&#8217;d have to see Gilbert&#8217;s methodology on this one, but I read about this on his blog a while back, and I really have to wonder at the assertions he&#8217;s making about children and happiness. I think his measure of happiness is off; he&#8217;s measuring in-the-moment satisfaction rather than overall reported life satisfaction, and something that does not provide one can provide the other. For example, the minutiae of my job do not make me happy, most of the time, but the overall result of a job well done and the structure it lends to my life do. </p>
<p>It also seems from this article that he&#8217;s measuring WOMEN&#8217;S happiness in relation to children, not men&#8217;s. There&#8217;s a simpler explanation for that &#8211; what if sexism and its effects on parenting roles is what makes women unhappy? I think my partner enjoys his time with our son in part because I buy our son&#8217;s clothes, wash his clothes, make his lunch, make his dinner, take care of all the doctor&#8217;s appointments, do most of the daycare pick up and dropoff, do most of the diapering, stock the diaper basket/bag, dress him, grocery shop to make sure we have food for him, do most of the childcare, research preschools, stay home with him when he&#8217;s sick, make sure his shoes fit, take him on trips, pick up his play area, wash his dishes, etc. etc. etc., in addition to working full-time myself. A lot of my time spent with my son ends up being multitasking, transportation, or mealtime/diapers, and I&#8217;m not at all unusual in this. It&#8217;s not my son making me unhappy, it&#8217;s everything else I have to do and how tired I get and how little time I have to myself! Most women I know end up doing even more of the &#8220;work&#8221; part of childcare than I do, and mothers who stay home do almost all of it, without the variety, stimulation, and adult interaction that a job outside the home provides. </p>
<p>I hate to say this, but my immediate reaction was, &#8220;Only a man would decide it was the kid&#8217;s fault without thinking about ingrained power imbalances!&#8221; You want a situation? Let&#8217;s talk about the situation of ingrained gender roles and systemic power imbalances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/the-situation-of-happiness/#comment-6168</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 12:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/08/23/the-situation-of-happiness/#comment-6168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is interesting to contemplate the relationship between Gilbert&#039;s finding about the negative correlation between number of kids and parental happiness, and the data on &lt;a href=&quot;http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/only-child-syndrome-or-adavantage/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;differences (or lack thereof) between only children and children with siblings&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting to contemplate the relationship between Gilbert&#8217;s finding about the negative correlation between number of kids and parental happiness, and the data on <a href="http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/08/19/only-child-syndrome-or-adavantage/" rel="nofollow">differences (or lack thereof) between only children and children with siblings</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
