<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slips, Falls, and the Situation of Tort Reform(ers)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/slips-falls-and-the-situation-of-tort-reformers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/slips-falls-and-the-situation-of-tort-reformers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 07:41:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Jersey Personal Injury Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/slips-falls-and-the-situation-of-tort-reformers/#comment-16298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[New Jersey Personal Injury Lawyer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/slips-falls-and-the-situation-of-tort-reformers/#comment-16298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bork sounds like he&#039;s a little bit of both a hyprocrite and a victim of “actor-observer effect.” Anyway, he settled nearly a year later in May 2008.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bork sounds like he&#8217;s a little bit of both a hyprocrite and a victim of “actor-observer effect.” Anyway, he settled nearly a year later in May 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Of Senators and Sympathies &#171; The Situationist</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/slips-falls-and-the-situation-of-tort-reformers/#comment-6951</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Of Senators and Sympathies &#171; The Situationist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 04:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/slips-falls-and-the-situation-of-tort-reformers/#comment-6951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] simple and satisfying (or not, depending on your political orientation), but it may be wrong. As I argued in an earlier post, charges of hypocrisy make dispositionist assumptions about the target and presume that the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] simple and satisfying (or not, depending on your political orientation), but it may be wrong. As I argued in an earlier post, charges of hypocrisy make dispositionist assumptions about the target and presume that the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Payne</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/slips-falls-and-the-situation-of-tort-reformers/#comment-4997</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack Payne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 01:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/slips-falls-and-the-situation-of-tort-reformers/#comment-4997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m surprised at the size of Judge Bork&#039;s law suit. A measly $1,000,000?

In our present day climate of run-away civil &quot;justice&quot; wouldn&#039;t $100,000,000 seem more logical?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised at the size of Judge Bork&#8217;s law suit. A measly $1,000,000?</p>
<p>In our present day climate of run-away civil &#8220;justice&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t $100,000,000 seem more logical?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/slips-falls-and-the-situation-of-tort-reformers/#comment-2694</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 22:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/slips-falls-and-the-situation-of-tort-reformers/#comment-2694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i often use a form of this when explaining to people why i&#039;m an atheist; that is, how can i &lt;I&gt; not &lt;/I&gt; believe in god?

i merely ask them whether they believe in Zeus, the Tooth Fairy, Easter Bunny, etc., and what are the reasons why not? then i point out that those are the same reasons why i don&#039;t believe in their god. it&#039;s a great way to put them in my situation.

needless to say, it rarely works (they think their god is real, after all), but it&#039;s a blast to see the cognitive dissonance play out on their faces!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i often use a form of this when explaining to people why i&#8217;m an atheist; that is, how can i <i> not </i> believe in god?</p>
<p>i merely ask them whether they believe in Zeus, the Tooth Fairy, Easter Bunny, etc., and what are the reasons why not? then i point out that those are the same reasons why i don&#8217;t believe in their god. it&#8217;s a great way to put them in my situation.</p>
<p>needless to say, it rarely works (they think their god is real, after all), but it&#8217;s a blast to see the cognitive dissonance play out on their faces!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug S.</title>
		<link>http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/slips-falls-and-the-situation-of-tort-reformers/#comment-2691</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 21:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesituationist.wordpress.com/2007/06/13/slips-falls-and-the-situation-of-tort-reformers/#comment-2691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advocating that a system should be changed and saying that people shouldn&#039;t take advantage of said system when they can are two different things. Bork might hold the position that people should file lawsuits that &lt;b&gt;do&lt;/b&gt; have a reasonable chance of success even if those lawsuits &lt;b&gt;ought&lt;/b&gt; not to have a reasonable chance of success, which would be consistent with his actions (assuming that his own lawsuit falls in the category of one that ought not to be able to succeed).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Advocating that a system should be changed and saying that people shouldn&#8217;t take advantage of said system when they can are two different things. Bork might hold the position that people should file lawsuits that <b>do</b> have a reasonable chance of success even if those lawsuits <b>ought</b> not to have a reasonable chance of success, which would be consistent with his actions (assuming that his own lawsuit falls in the category of one that ought not to be able to succeed).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
